|

|
Telecommunications Regulation. This submission analyses how the Commerce Commission comes to its mistaken conclusions. It focuses on its policy framework and on the cost benefit analysis that underlies the claim that $71.25m net benefit by confusing consumer benefits with efficiency gains. The "Submission on the Commerce Commission's Amended Draft Report on Telecommunications Act 2001 Section 64 Review" is published by the New Zealand Business Roundtable
|
|
By New Zealand Business Roundtable, New Zealand.
|
Business Policy Resource.
|
|

| ICT skills in the UK and Germany: How companies adapt and react. This study analyses and assesses the contrasting national strategies associated with skill supply for information and communication technologies (ICT) in Britain and Germany. It also examines the impact of these strategies on firms and assess the usefulness to companies of skills at different qualification levels. It concludes with policy implications for change in publicly financed ICT skill supply strategies that emerge from this analysis. By Hilary Steedman, Karin Wagner, Jim Foreman. | By Anglo-German Foundation, UK. | Business Policy Resource. |
|
|

| Comparing London and Frankfurt as world cities. The report examines changing relations between London and Frankfurt with the introduction of a single European currency and the decision to locate the European Central Bank in Frankfurt. Based on interviews with key personnel in global financial and business service firms and institutions in both cities, the findings support a network model of inter-city relations, which, the authors contend, is more appropriate than the simplistic competition model that dominates public discussion. By Jonathan V. Beaverstock, Michael Hoyler, Kathryn Pain, Peter J. Taylor. | By Anglo-German Foundation, UK, Germany. | Business Policy Resource. |
|
|

| In the Public Interest? Assessing the potential for Public Interest Companies Public Interest Companies are ?not-for-profit? organisations that deliver public services. Frequently controversial, they are at the forefront of the debate about the future of public services. Network Rail, National Air Traffic Services, housing associations, further education colleges, school companies, NHS foundation trusts and ?not-for-profit PFIs? are just some of the Public Interest Companies in use or that have been proposed. This report provides a hard-headed analysis of what role Public Interest Companies should play in the future of public services and follows on from ippr?s work on Public Private Partnerships. It suggests that these alternative organisational forms might help safeguard the public interest when contracting for public services and might better involve local communities in the delivery of services. However, difficult issues remain regarding finance, risk, accountability and governance. Public Interest Companies should only be used with caution. | By Institute for Public Policy Research, UK. | Business Policy Resource. |
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 Next > End >>
|